Bringing together practitioners on all sides of issues in arbitration, courts and state and federal agencies

Supreme Court Watch

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Nitro-Lift Technologies, LLC v. Howard, No. 11-1377 (Nov. 26, 2012).
By Nina Kimball

Invoking the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, the U.S. Supreme Court reiterated its long-standing position that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) trumps contrary state law.  This principle is so well established that the Court did not need to hear oral argument to decide it.  The only thing unusual about this case is the fact that the case concerned a non-compete agreement – a dispute that rarely reaches the high court. 

The case arose after two Nitro-Lift employees went to work for a competitor. Nitro-Lift served them with a demand for arbitration under the arbitration provision of their employment agreements requiring all disputes to be settled by arbitration.  The employees filed suit in state court seeking a declaratory judgment declaring the non-compete agreements void under Oklahoma law.  The court dismissed the lawsuit, requiring the dispute be submitted to arbitration.  On appeal, the Oklahoma Supreme Court first found that the dispute of the underlying employment agreement was subject to judicial review as purely a matter of state law for state-court determination.  It reversed, holding the non-compete agreements void under Oklahoma law.   

The Court granted certiorari and vacated the Oklahoma Supreme Court’s decision in a per curiam decision.  The Court reiterated the rule under the Supremacy Clause that the federal statute (the FAA) trumps the state statute disfavoring non-competition agreements.  Applying the FAA, the Court held that because the dispute concerned the validity the contract itself, not the arbitration provision, it was for the arbitrator to decide, not a court:  “when parties commit to arbitrate contractual disputes, it is a mainstay of the [FAA’s] substantive law that attacks on the validity of the contract, as distinct from attacks on the validity of the arbitration clause itself, are to be resolved by the arbitrator in the first instance, not by a federal or state court."  

Labor & Employment Law Committees

  • Employment Law Committee
  • Labor & Employment Communications Committee
    This committee publishes information relevant to the labor & employment bar. If you are interested in an editorial position or publishing an article, please contact us.

    Contact Information

    Brian J MacDonough

    Shilepsky Hartley Robb Casey Michon, LLP

    (617) 4472809

    Robert Alan Fisher

    Foley Hoag LLP

    (617) 832-1000

  • Labor & Employment Education Committee
    Help develop relevant and innovative educational sessions led by a diverse group of talented speakers who cover labor and employment law issues.

    Contact Information

    Christopher Feudo

    Foley Hoag LLP

    (617) 832-1000

    Sherley E. Rodriguez

    Suffolk University Law School

    (617) 573-8000

    Matthew C. Moschella

    Sherin and Lodgen LLP

    (617) 646-2245

    James S. Weliky

    Messing, Rudavsky & Weliky, PC

    (617) 742-0004

    William E. Hannum

    Schwartz Hannum PC

    (978) 623-0900

    Natacha Thomas

    (617) 273-2326

  • Labor & Employment Public Policy Committee
    The BBA is very active in legislative and regulatory changes. Labor & employment attorneys are often asked to lend their expertise.

    Contact Information

    Katherine J. Michon

    Shilepsky Hartley Robb Casey Michon, LLP

    (617) 723-8000

    Rachel Reingold Mandel

    Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

    (617) 994-5700

  • Labor & Employment Public Service Committee
    This committee focuses on practice are specific pro bono trainings and brown bag programming.

    Contact Information

    Nicole Corvini

    Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

    (617) 994-5700

  • Labor Law Committee
    This committee is composed of lawyers for management, unions and individuals. It focuses on traditional labor issues in the private and public sector, and is responsible for monitoring legal developments in the area of labor law and presenting educational programs in this area.
  • Non-Compete & Trade Secrets
    The Non-Compete &Trade Secrets Committee works to ensure that attorneys are kept apprised of developments in this constantly evolving area of business and employment law, whether in the form of judicial precedent, legislative mandate or business practice.

    Contact Information

    Christopher J. Perry

    Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, PC

    (781) 622-5930

    Jennifer Catlin Davis

    Kotin, Crabtree & Strong, LLP

    (617) 227-7031

  • Steering Committee
    The leadership committee of the Section organizes programs and discusses policy. To inquire about opportunities, please contact the Section Co-Chairs.
  • Wage & Hour Committee
    This committee keeps the community up to date on wage and hour developments and trends.