Improving advocacy and trial skills for litigators who practice in state court, federal court and alternative-dispute venues

BBA's Writers Pool: Securities Enforcement in the Wake of the Financial Crisis

By Robert T. Alfred

Nearly five years after the financial crisis, its continuing impact on regulatory and criminal enforcement was explored on April 4 at “Securities Enforcement: Recent Developments, Trial Strategies & Getting to a Non-Prosecution Agreement.”  

Current Enforcement Efforts by the SEC and U.S. Attorney’s Office:  

The SEC is becoming more proactive in looking for law violations, said John Dugan, Assoc. Director of the SEC’s Boston Regional Office.  In particular, the SEC’s recent focus on proactive enforcement has led to several risk-based initiatives that use new analytical tools and technology to identify “red flags” in company filings, portfolio performance, and other market activities.  Likewise, the DOJ has become more focused on securities fraud than at any other time, said Paul Levenson, Economic Crimes Unit Chief of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Boston.  The government has not seen a drop in investment schemes post Madoff, continued Levenson.  But through close cooperation with the SEC and other government agencies, federal criminal prosecutors can identify potential cases earlier and get the right set of investigatory tools to bear on a particular problem, increasing the government’s ability to prove financial fraud at trial. 

Trial Strategies:

Juries are capable of deciding most white-collar cases, but lawyers need to keep it simple and to keep it moving, said Andrew Lelling, Assistant U.S. Attorney in Boston’s Economic Crimes Unit.  Securities trials, however, are different; additional, industry specific education is required to ensure that jurors comprehend the information presented.  It is better to avoid calling expert witnesses to educate the jury at trial, advised Jack Falvey Jr., a Partner in Goodwin Procter’s litigation group; you have no control over what they say, yet they are identified with you.  Experts are there to be turned, Judge Douglas Woodlock of the U.S. District Court in Boston, further explained.  A trial attorney’s focus should be on presenting a comprehensive narrative, and experts often cause greater confusion.  Instead, strategic use of visual aids can be a more effective way to direct juries to the facts you think are important, suggested Daniel Tighe, a Partner at Griesinger Tighe & Maffei LLP.  But there is real danger in putting too much up on the screen, cautioned Judge Woodlock; lawyers have to be tactical and present only the most essential documents to the jury.

The Role of Internal Investigations:

The goal of an internal investigation should be to convince the government not to initiate an enforcement action against the company.  Self-reporting, being transparent with the government, and conducting a credible investigation are keys to success, advised Randall Bodner and Daniel O’Connor, Partners at Ropes & Gray who obtained the SEC’s only non-prosecution agreement to date, for Carter’s, Inc.  Even if the choice is made not to self-report, counsel must be able to demonstrate that the problem was found through self-policing, was investigated thoroughly by independent investigators, and was effectively remediated to eliminate the risk of repeat issues.  However, as Cynthia Young, Deputy Criminal Chief of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Boston reminded the audience, the government expects companies to self-report; it is much worse for the company if the government finds out on its own.  
Given the proactive approach of the SEC and DOJ in the wake of the financial crisis, if there is a problem, it is more likely than ever that the government will find it.

The expert panelists at Securities Enforcement: Recent Developments, Trial Strategies & Getting to a Non-Prosecution Agreement included:

Panel One - SEC/DOJ Trends & Developments
Jonathan L. Kotlier - Nutter McLennen & Fish LLP (Moderator)
David P. Bergers - Regional Director & Acting Deputy Chief of Enforcement – SEC
Paul G. Levenson - Chief, Economic Crimes Unit, U.S. Attorney’s Office
Emily R. Schulman - Wilmer Hale Pickering and Dorr LLP
Nicholas C. Theodorou - Foley Hoag LLP

Panel Two - Trying Securities Cases: Can the Jury Really Get it?
Rachel E. Hershfang - Securities & Exchange Commission (Moderator)
Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock - U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts
John J. Falvey - Goodwin Procter LLP
Andrew E. Lelling - U.S. Attorney’s Office
Daniel P. Tighe - Griesinger Tighe & Maffei LLP

Panel Three - Internal Investigations Done Right: Obtaining a Non-Prosecution Agreement & Other Ways to Protect Shareholder Value
Ian D. Roffman - Nutter, Mclennen & Fish LLP (Moderator)
Cynthia A. Young - Chief of Criminal Division U.S. Attorney’s Office - District of Massachusetts
Randall W. Bodner - Ropes & Gray LLP
Stephen G. Huggard - Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
R. Daniel O’Connor - Ropes & Gray LLP

Robert T. Alfred is a litigation attorney with experience representing corporate and individual clients in complex commercial litigation, white-collar criminal defense, internal investigations, and corporate compliance matters. For more on Robert,  click here .

Litigation Committees

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee
    This committee hosts speakers on a wide variety of issues relating to arbitration, mediation and other dispute resolution processes. It strives to offer programs that are of value to individuals who serve as mediators and arbitrators, as well as advocates representing clients in dispute resolution processes, both domestic and international.

    Contact Information

    James B. Peloquin

    Conn Kavanaugh Rosenthal Peisch & Ford, LLP

    (617) 482-8200

    William McClare Dunham

    Locke Lord, LLP

    (617) 239-0248

  • Antitrust & Business Litigation Committee
    This committee provides a means of dialogue and learning for members who share an interest in business litigation.

    Contact Information

    Stephen D. Riden

    Beck Reed Riden LLP

    (617) 500-8660

    Rachel M. Brown

    City of Lowell Law Department

    (978) 674-4050

    David B. Mack

    O'Connor, Carnathan, and Mack LLC

    (781) 359-9005

  • Class Actions Committee
    This committee explores the ever-changing landscape of class action practice and procedure in federal and state courts in a wide variety of areas, including mass torts, environmental law, securities and consumer fraud.

    Contact Information

    Lauren Guth Barnes

    Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP

    (617) 482-3700

    Matthew G. Lindenbaum

    Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP

    (617) 202-4632

  • Construction Law Committee
    This committee addresses all aspects of construction law, including contract documents and alternative project delivery systems; construction litigation, arbitration and ADR; public contract law and other legal issues of interest to practitioners who handle matters relating to construction.

    Contact Information

    Carolyn Marie Francisco

    Corwin & Corwin LLP

    (617) 742-3420

    Jeff D. Bernarducci

    Holland & Knight LLP

    (617) 854-1408

  • Environmental Litigation Committee
    This committee focuses on Chapter 21E, CERCLA, insurance, clean air and clean water litigation.

    Contact Information

    Seth Schofield

    Office of the Massachusetts Attorney General

    (617) 727-2200

    Katherine Kimball

    Morgan Lewis

    (617) 341-7700

  • Federal Practice and Procedure Committee
    This committee concentrates on developments in federal civil procedure and practical issues affecting practice in federal court. Areas covered include changes and proposed changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the District of Massachusetts' Local Rules; reports of new and significant decisions interpreting the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence; and presentations concerning such practical matters as the District of Massachusetts' mediation program and the use of technology in the courtroom.

    Contact Information

    Benjamin M. Stern

    Holland & Knight LLP

    (617) 305-2022

    Matthew N. Kane

    Donnelly, Conroy & Gelhaar, LLP

    (617) 720-2880

  • Intellectual Property Litigation Committee
    This is a joint committee between the Intellectual Property and Litigation Sections. This committee provides education concerning the enforcement of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secrets rights as well as the defense of those accused of infringing on such rights, in federal and state courts and before the International Trade Commission.

    Contact Information

    Kelli Powell

    Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP

    (617) 526-6819

    Dalila Wendlandt

    Ropes & Gray LLP

    (617) 951-7884

    Christina M Licursi

    Wolf Greenfield

    (617) 646-8384

  • Litigation Membership Committee
    This committee aims to increase participation in the Section through outreach activities.

    Contact Information

    Carla Reeves

    Manion Gaynor & Manning LLP

    (617) 670 8800

  • Litigation Public Policy Committee
    The BBA is very active in legislative and regulatory changes. Attorneys are often asked to lend their expertise.

    Contact Information

    Christopher D. Strang

    Strang, Scott, Giroux & Young, LLP

    (857) 233-5534

    Alexandra M. Gorman

    Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP & Affiliates

    (617) 573-4852

  • Litigation Public Service Committee
    Each year in recognition of Pro Bono Month, this committee, along with the Rappaport Center for Law and Public Service at Suffolk University Law School holds a pro bono opportunities fair for attorneys and law students. The committee also focuses on pro bono trainings and brown bag programming.

    Contact Information

    Jonathan Hayden

    McCormack Firm, LLC

    (617) 951 2929

  • Massachusetts Practice and Procedure Committee
    This committee concentrates on developments in Massachusetts civil procedure and practical issues affecting practice in Massachusetts courts.

    Contact Information

    R. Victoria Fuller

    White and Williams LLP

    Nigel Long

    Liberty Mutual Group

  • Professional Liability Committee
    This committee covers issues involving the liability of accountants, lawyers, physicians, architects and other professionals for malpractice, including liability under federal statutes and consumer protection laws.

    Contact Information

    Gary M. Ronan

    Goulston & Storrs PC

    (617) 574-3593

    Debra A. Squires-Lee

    Sherin and Lodgen LLP

    (617) 646-2036

  • Securities Enforcement and Litigation Committee
    This committee aims to foster dialogue among the legal and investigatory staff of securities regulators, lawyers who represent companies and persons involved in regulatory investigations/enforcement proceedings and lawyers who represent plaintiffs in private securities litigation and shareholder derivative actions.

    Contact Information

    Sarah G. Kim

    Massachusetts Department of the State Treasurer

    (617) 367-9333

    Richard Rosensweig

    Goulston & Storrs PC

    (617) 482-1776

    Kathryn Alessi

    Sidley Austin LLP

    (617) 223-0364

  • Steering Committee
    The goal of the Committee for Attorneys with Disabilities is to build fellowship between attorneys with disabilities and their professional allies; share experiences, resources and career advancement strategies; and provide a forum for increased communication and understanding within the legal community. The Committee will work to develop opportunities for attorneys with disabilities and their allies to converge in social and educational settings.
  • Tort Committee
    This committee addresses all matters relating to injury and damage to persons and property.

    Contact Information

    Steven J. Bolotin

    Morrison Mahoney LLP

    (617) 439-7500

    Eric Asquith

    Todd & Weld LLP

    (617) 624-4769